Error message

Notice: Undefined index: und in BeanBagLatestMedia->view() (line 172 of /home/relmag/public_html/sites/default/modules/bean_bag/plugins/bean/

Notice: Undefined variable: summary in BeanBagLatestMedia->view() (line 176 of /home/relmag/public_html/sites/default/modules/bean_bag/plugins/bean/

The Real Abuse at the Heart of 'Fifty Shades of Grey'

This Friday's "romantic" movie is harmful, and not just in the ways you might think.

By this point, all of us have heard of E.L. James’ bestselling erotic novel, Fifty Shades of Grey. The book has sold over 100 million copies around the world, and the movie is set to open at $60 million.

I’m sure many of you, like myself, have sat on public transportation silently judging those around you who toted around the paperback, wondering at the appeal of the depiction of a BDSM relationship in this Twilight fanfiction. I made fun of the snippets of prose I heard and wrinkled my nose at descriptions of the plot.

In my shallow judgment, however, I overlooked several key problems in the text. Although I correctly characterized it as pornographic, I didn’t make the link that so often comes with pornography: the encouragement of violence against women. Upon closer inspection, Fifty Shades of Grey is not just harmless “mommy porn.” it clearly depicts a deeply abusive relationship in which its protagonist suffers emotional and physical violence at the hands of her partner. And, worst of all, it doesn’t seem to realize this.

Fifty Shades of Grey is not just harmless “mommy porn.” it clearly depicts a deeply abusive relationship ... And, worst of all, it doesn’t seem to realize this.

Amy Bonomi, professor and chairperson of Michigan State University’s Department of Human Development and Family studies, has made some disturbing findings. A thorough 2013 study of the book concludes that “emotional and sexual abuse is pervasive in the novel,” appearing in almost every interaction between the protagonists, Anastasia and Christian. Both exhibit textbook signs of abuse: Christian, the so-called love interest, actively stalks Ana, purchasing her place of work and tracking her whereabouts through an app on her phone (“No place to run. I would find you. I can track your cell phone—remember?”). He controls her behaviors, her food intake, and dictates who she is allowed to spend her time with, isolating her from friends and family. He belittles her, threatens her and blames her. As a consequence, Ana is afraid of making Christian angry, afraid to talk to her friends, and insecure in her own personhood (“He’d probably like to beat seven shades of s*** out of me. The thought is depressing”).

Far from “empowering,” Fifty Shades seeks to remove agency. Even though it’s supposed to seem “sexy,” the book even includes several instances of rape, where Ana is coerced into or outright forced to have sex. The BDSM community itself has been outspoken on the issue, distancing itself from the horrific lack of safety or consent in the novel: “Fifty Shades is not about fun,” says BDSM practitioner, Sophie Morgan, in The Guardian. “It’s about abuse.”

“Lose control,” a movie poster urges. Another shows Christian Grey with a tie wrapped around his fist. “I exercise control in all things, Miss Steele,” he says in the trailer. When Anastasia asks, “Why are you trying to change me?” he replies with the saccharine, “I’m not. It’s you that’s changing me.”

While there have been several well-rendered and moving depictions of abuse in media, all of these recognize domestic violence as a cardinal sin; none are as bafflingly oblivious as Fifty Shades of Grey. The marketing for the film is sickening: posited as “an incredible fairytale love story,” encouraged as a date-night movie, and set to release just in time for Valentine’s Day, Fifty Shades barrels ahead without an ounce of self-awareness—or, perhaps, of conscience. The abusive behaviors are treated as adorably flirtatious interaction; here, domestic violence is met with the enthusiastic approval of the story’s protagonists.

The message is clear: by turning these same behaviors around to market them as “romance,” this film effectively silences the experience of millions of victims of abuse. She might not think that she likes being mistreated, it says, but in the end, isn’t it what she really wanted? Christian Grey can do no wrong, so the fault must lie squarely on the shoulders of the 21-year-old college student in a relationship with a rich older man.

By setting it up as romantic, this movie sends out the toxic message that, in the end, you can change your abuser.

Reprehensible threats and behavior are represented as playful fun; force ends up being acceptable because, although it starts with Anastasia’s terror, it ends with her enjoyment. This is what women want, says Fifty Shades of Grey: the perpetuation of violent rape culture. Here, coercion is acceptable, abuse is extolled, and consent is ignored. Psychiatrist Dr. Miriam Grossman sums it up well: “Fifty Shades of Grey teaches your daughter that pain and humiliation are erotic, and your son, that girls want a guy who controls, intimidates and threatens.”

In the weeks leading up to the movie’s release, hundreds of boycotts have sprouted up on social media: #50dollarsnot50shades encourages potential viewers to donate the $50 they would have spent on a night out at the movies to a local women’s shelter for survivors of domestic abuse.

Films like these are honestly a regressive step back in society’s perception of violence against women. The argument that “Fifty Shades of Grey is just fantasy!” has been popular in defending the movie’s treatment of its protagonist, but it doesn’t quite ring true. Unfortunately, for one in four American women, Fifty Shades is a brutal reality.

By setting it up as romantic, this movie sends out the toxic message that, in the end, you can change your abuser. It tells sufferers that their experience is invalid, and, like Anastasia, they should learn to accept and enjoy their situation.

And Christians should care about this—more than just disliking the book for its R-rated content, we should also practice empathy and fight for the women that have been affected by abusive relationships.

We like to believe that we are somehow immune to the ideas and values that are pumped out by the culture that we live in, but that isn’t true. We like to label fiction as “just a story,” cutting it off from our world, but truthfully, every story that is told comes from a very specific point of view. Everyone wants to say something, and the television, books, and movies that lack a clear agenda most obviously show the values and acceptable behaviors of a society: the casual image of a fully-clothed man surrounded by women in swimsuits in a commercial for an unrelated product, the seemingly justified violence equated with masculinity in action movies, the big-gesture moments in romantic comedies that undermine the hard work of real relationships.

We cannot continue to mistake infatuation for romance, or obsession for love.

Bonomi’s second study shows that women who have read Fifty Shades are more likely to have an abusive partner and unhealthy eating habits, and regardless of causation, the correlation is troubling.

It is so difficult to be aware, but our world is built of stories, good or bad, lazy or carefully constructed, and each disseminates its own point of view. Fifty Shades fills the shape of violence and abuse with the concept of romance, and this is the most dangerous tactic E.L. James could have used, whether or not she realizes this. We cannot continue to mistake infatuation for romance, or obsession for love.

Christian Grey should look up the definition of love in 1 Corinthians: unlike his treatment of Anastasia, real love is “patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud.  It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.”

This love doesn’t need to be forceful or dramatic because it operates out of freedom and grace. As followers of Christ, we can look at a relationship as a partnership of two people striving toward the same goal—to glorify God—and reacting gently, sacrificially and intentionally with one another.

Top Comments



Sine commented…

Absolutely brilliant article, thank you.


Jeremysepicreads :D


Jeremysepicreads :D commented…

More Relentless hate I see!

Robbie Morford


Robbie Morford commented…

Thank you for writing this, and for in a way, reviewing this film. As a man that's committed to learning how to interact with women in a sacrificial way, I instinctively knew I wouldn't be able to watch this film. However, reading your article gives me the ability to at least have a somewhat informed conversation with those in community around me. I applaud your courage for taking a stand for what you believe, especially in a culture where you will most likely be ridiculed and mocked for your views.

Brenda Peterson


Brenda Peterson commented…

The books and/or movies based on 50 shades, obviously did not 'cause' domestic violence. However, it does perpetuate it.

And as far as the movie's link to Christianity, perhaps read the portion in the second book. Christian tied Anastasia to a cross and sexually abuses her.

Why would tie her to a cross? Why use Christian symbolism and sexual abuse together?

According to victims of satanic ritual abuse, as children, they were tied to a cross each Easter and sexually assaulted. (among other horrifying things).. I was a crisis line & crisis intake counsellor for 10 years.

Fifty shades is chock full of satanic ritual abuse, combined with Christian symbolism

For this reason alone, Christians have a right to be involved. Imagine if another religions symbolism was being used in the books....would they not have a right to speak out???

This debate is no longer about moral purity. It is about whether or not we allow satanic ritualistic abuse to be combined with Christianity.

Other bdsm books promoting 50 shades type lifestyle, cite worship of lucifer is the true reason for channelling demons through the authors into a "slave/master" sexual type relationship.

If this was not true, then why would the authors of various bdsm books state it? Christianity, is about choice, and free will. Those who choose to worship lucifer are free to do so. However, Christians have a right to weigh in on the matter, when their spiritual symbols are mixed with that of another religion, then, combined with sexualized violence, without apparent thought, or consultation.

Peggy Perry


Peggy Perry commented…

I no more understand the appeal of the BDSM lifestyle than I do the appeal of shooting your friends with paintballs. But as a reader of over 50 years and a personal library of at least a couple of thousand books, I did understand the excruciatingly awful writing of the excerpts that I read from the books. The movie trailers I had to suffer through were just as bad. Women I know personally claim the books and the movie are wonderful. I wonder how her sons look at it. Do they think, like many men I have heard, that since women express such admiration, should they be treating women as Christian treats Anastasia? I must confess I am incredibly offended by his name.



htruh commented…

Cấy ghép implant có đau không là câu hỏi của rất nhiều người khi tìm hiểu về phương pháp này. Trên thực tế nó có “không đau” như nhiều quảng cáo hay không, chúng ta hãy cùng tìm hiểu.

Please log in or register to comment

Log In