Questions No Victim of Domestic Violence Should Have to Answer

And ways to actually help those who have suffered

In her own words, Janay Rice has lived a “nightmare.” She has suffered not only the assault by her then-fiancé, but cruel scrutiny after TMZ posted the videos of her terrifying experience online. How many have forgotten that she is a person? Some have stood up for Janay, validating her suffering and challenging the public to become better educated about domestic violence. Others have pointed fingers and debated questions Janay Rice (or any victim of domestic violence) shouldn’t have had to face:

1. What Did She Do to Provoke the Attack?

I don’t know Janay Rice or the nuances of her relationship with her then-fiance now-husband. But years of listening to victims, researching and advocating has taught me not to jump to conclusions. Domestic violence is lot like a hall of mirrors—What’s obvious doesn’t necessarily reflect reality. For example, swatting isn’t always aggressive. Experts say a victim may swat an aggressor in self-defense, to retaliate, and sometimes in anticipation of danger (a word, gesture or look).

But when an aggressor swats a victim—or knocks her out—he usually means to exert power and control in the relationship. There is a big difference when comparing motives. It takes a professional to figure out who is and is not the aggressor. Law enforcement weighs this when deciding who is at fault; in this case they charged Ray Rice for third degree aggravated assault. Nobody should have asked Janay Rice why her bulkier, stronger fiancé assaulted her, and there is never, ever a provocation that warrants assault.

2. Why Did She Defend Her Abuser?

Earlier this year, Janay sat beside her husband in a news conference when he apologized to Ravens owner Steve Biscotti, general manager Ozzie Newsome and coach John Harbaugh. He also apologized to “fans, to the kids, to everyone who was affected by this situation that me and my wife were in." Many criticized Rice for not including his wife in the public apology. Domestic violence experts took issue that he spoke of Janay as an equal contributor to the violence, especially after charges against her were dropped.

Usually an abuser has groomed a victim to believe she is to blame, and so she feels responsible.

It confused many when Janay admitted: "I do deeply regret the role I played in the incident that night, but I can say that I am happy that we continue to work through it together.” From the outside, it makes little sense why a victim stands by the assailant. But love and hope for change factors powerfully into the reasons many victims defend an abuser. Janay seemed to express this when she defended her husband: “I love Ray, and I know that he will continue to prove himself not only to you all but to the community, and I know he will gain your respect back in due time.”

Experts caution victims not to underestimate potential volatility and danger. Victims may also defend the abuser due to fear, coercion, threats, denial, shame, blame, economic necessity and events relating to the cycle of abuse. Only Janay knows the reasons for defending her husband. While some may have a healthy interest in her safety, judging her choices is disrespectful and inappropriate.

3. Why Did She Stay With Her Abuser?

A victim often stays with the abuser. She may tell herself the violence was a “one-time incident” and “it won’t happen again.” Usually an abuser has groomed a victim to believe she is to blame, and so she feels responsible. She believes that if she sticks with the relationship and keeps trying, the abuse will stop.

Cultural factors also play into her decisions. For example, ideal images of womanhood may cause her to suffer for the sake of her children having a father. Her faith may also factor into staying—trusting in God and the power of prayer, beliefs about forgiveness, and thinking that leaving isn’t an option. Typically, an abuser has isolated a victim from family, friends and finances, keeping her emotionally and economically dependent. She may not believe she can survive on her own; she may feel she has no options. The reasons victims stay are complex and numerous.

In recent months, many have dissected Janay’s decision to marry Ray Rice, and she has chosen to keep that private. In a recent statement, she asked the public to respect that: “Just know we will continue to grow and show the world what real love is!” Rather than asking questions, we would do well to pray that Janay and her husband have the resources for his rehabilitation as they rebuild their lives and build a new future.

How To Support Victims of Intimate Partner Violence

So what can we do to help? Here are a few ideas:

  • 1. Educate yourself to recognize signs of abuse
  • 2. Believe victims. Don’t ask judgmental questions.
  • 3. Urge victims to take precautions to keep themselves and their children safe.
  • 4. Refer victims to professional abuse counselors and shelters that usually have better resources for responding to immediate needs than faith communities.
  • 5. Encourage victims to seek continued prayer support, loving fellowship, and spiritual guidance that so many churches have to offer.
  • 6. Proclaim that the Bible condemns abuse—whether physical, verbal, emotional or sexual—over one hundred times. And while Christ’s love for the church should be the model for Christian marriage, an abusive marriage cannot reflect that plan (Malachi 2:16).
  • 7. Prayerfully wrestle with the biblical, theological, and practical implications that apply to unique people and situations.
  • Top Comments

    Hannah Holtgeerts

    11

    Hannah Holtgeerts commented…

    So thankful for point #4 – there are a lot of great groups that are doing amazing things outside of churches. I'm thankful that Relevant can recognize that.

    3 Comments

    Laurna Tallman

    3

    Laurna Tallman commented…

    In 1983 in Canada the so-called "rape shield" law was passed, which allows a partner to charge her or his partner without proof or evidence. This legislation was hailed as a victory for feminism. In 1991, a judge of the Supreme Court wrote his opinion that it was theoretically possible for the accused to mount a defense but that in practice it was virtually impossible to do so. Not to be able to get a fair trial is, of course, a violation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms section 11(d) (within the Canadian Constitution). As US attorney Glen Greenwald mentioned in an interview, it is impossible to prove a negative in a court of law. This means the law under which violent domestic disputes are litigated in this country is unconstitutional. If you examine the statistics available in this country before Stephen Harper suppressed the census data-collection so vital to social scientists, you find that women are as likely to be violent as men in their intimate relationships and are equally matched on most types of assault although they are somewhat less likely to do ultimate harm, i.e., murder, presumably as a result of their lesser strength, although that factor is debated. Thus, it is reasonable to estimate that, since 1983, about half of the hundreds of persons jailed for assault in Canada were innocent people, mostly men, unable to get a fair trial. As our son in no way retaliated, his clothing was soaked in blood before she left in her psychotic daze to call the police and he was able to call for help. Among his fellow prisoners he saw that many were partners of mentally ill individuals whose sickness is understood neither by psychiatry nor by those with judicial responsibility, less by those affiliated with the judicial system. Our son refused to prefer charges against his mentally ill partner to protect her from those harmful systems and was perfunctorily put in jail. The legal and social branding he endures and other outcomes of his sacrifice, which was consciously Christ-like, continue to take a toll on him and other members of his family. His partner, on the other hand, appears to have had something like a conversion experience. She knows now that love is not a fluffy feeling, but a decision to love even if you have been harmed, yea, even if you have looked in to the darkness in another heart. That awareness echos the scripture: "He loved us while we were still in our sins." Our son knows that mental illness can be cured because his brother's was; he witnessed that healing, and others. I most certainly am not supporting partner abuse or entertaining the expectation that a person who has been treated violently is likely to behave like our son. I personally would not tolerate violence; I have counselled zero tolerance to abused women. I encouraged him to lay charges, which increased the duress under which he made his decisions. Although I am a woman of faith, I did not anticipate what has happened. I don't know what the long-term results will be of the path he has chosen. But I have been taught through this very painful experience that we should remain open to the possibility of Grace.

    Hannah Holtgeerts

    11

    Hannah Holtgeerts commented…

    So thankful for point #4 – there are a lot of great groups that are doing amazing things outside of churches. I'm thankful that Relevant can recognize that.

    Amy R. Buckley

    52

    Amy R. Buckley commented…

    #Stop the Silence story highlighting reasons some victims fear leaving an abusive marriage… http://shelovesmagazine.com/2014/living-lie/

    Please log in or register to comment

    Log In