How Not to Talk About Purity

It's time to stop using demeaning object lessons to talk about the sanctity of sex.

A chewed stick of gum. Tape that’s lost its stickiness. A torn up piece of paper. Unwrapped gifts. Dirty chocolate.

All of these analogies have been used to describe girls who had sex before getting married. And all of them equate to the same message: Your worth is inextricably tied to your sexual purity.

The chewed stick of gum analogy is one kidnapping victim Elizabeth Smart remembered hearing.

“For me, I thought ‘I’m that chewed-up piece of gum,’” she told a panel. “Nobody re-chews a piece of gum. You throw it away. And that’s how easy it is to feel you no longer have worth. Your life no longer has value.”

When I read Smart’s remarks last spring, I wasn’t surprised. I grew up in the Church, I was raised in what many now term "purity culture." I signed the “purity pledge,” and for years, I wore a True Love Waits ring on my ring finger. I believed that I would not be valuable in the eyes of my future husband if I engaged in premarital sexual activity. I bought into the metaphors my peers and I were fed in our high school youth group, metaphors that were not too far off from the gum example, metaphors that equated sexual purity with worth.

And this isn’t just an ultra-conservative Christian phenomenon. It’s everywhere—in churches, schools, homes. In red and blue, Northern and Southern states.
I wanted to see if there were others like myself who had grown up hearing object lessons related to purity education. I created the Twitter hashtag #NotYourObjectLesson. I began with discussing the tape object lesson, and then asked others to share object lessons or metaphors used to objectify the bodies of girls and women. 
Below is a small sample of the tweets using #NotYourObjectLesson, shared here with permission:

The examples are devastating and heartbreaking. Writers and activists on Twitter and the blogosphere have been active in pushing back against these harmful lessons. Dianna E. Anderson, author of the upcoming Damaged Goods due out in February 2015, has extensively written about the ways purity culture objectifies women. Twitter user @seelolago founded and manages No Shame Movement, a space to discuss the damaging rhetoric of purity culture.

You Might Also Like

In Romans 12:2, Paul writes, "Be no longer conformed to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is—His good, pleasing and perfect will." Of course, teaching about abstinence and the sanctity of sex is important, and viewing sex as a sacred gift from God is a way to be transformed. But if we, as the Church, sit back and let these damaging metaphors and lessons continue to be taught and encouraged in our congregations, youth groups, and schools, we are actually conforming to the "patterns of this world."
By using metaphors that objectify women and girls, we are following the example set by our larger society. While we may not be plastering up images of Victoria's Secret models, we are placing the bodies of girls, and with that, the value of their virginity, onto a pedestal. We are reducing women to objects, which may be used and disposed of when their "value" declines.

By a youth pastor telling a group of girls that their value is less because of sex, much like a "chewed up piece of gum," that individual is guilty of objectifying women, and following in the steps of this world. As others before me have noted, this model of objectification feeds into rape culture.

Please, let that sink in.
When we reduce women to disposable objects (or objects of any kind), we are diminishing their humanity. We are taking away their autonomy, their individual will by comparing them to inanimate objects without power. It's easier for a perpetrator to exert force over a victim if the victim's body has been objectified. When we, as members of the Church, use these reductive object lessons, we are participating and enabling a destructive culture against the bodies of girls and women. 
“Purity culture” needs to be redeemed, and this begins with the Church. This begins by examining our language and prayerfully considering the ways we can constructively discuss sexuality and the body. If we are to truly conform to a godly and Jesus-like pattern, we need to humbly listen to voices of girls—like Elizabeth Smart and countless others—who have been hurt by these metaphors. We need to have difficult, but critical, conversations about sexuality. We need to answer questions with integrity, not simply giving a moralizing lesson. We need grace to mourn our past mistakes, to hold each other up and to move forward. 

Top Comments

Holly Campbell


Holly Campbell commented…

I did read this article ... Didn't like it... Believe it glosses over our sin and makes it "pastel" . This does in NO WAY address those who have been sexually violated!!! It is exactly because we are worth so much to God that he des not want us to demean and devalue ourselves with less than He intended. WE settle for less ... But for those who repent there is absolute forgiveness and cleansing. No word picture of God and how he views and interacts with His creation is without shortfall. But most do have a kernel of truth within . even Jesus' parables couldn't be followed through their human conclusion. God all too often is quite clear as to his expectations of his followers. It is when we "bend the rules" we veer into very unstable ground. The only cure for that is repentance not offense. Again none of this pertains to those sexually violated.

Vic Christian


Vic Christian replied to Lim Seonyoung's comment

Have gone to a variety of conservative churches for over forty years and have never heard any such comments. If anything, the same message of purity was to both men and women, with fornication being sin for both genders. Side note - with sexual sin, there are related problems to warn of - such as a child to raise or put up for adoption, the push by the world to abort the baby, disease, etc.


Marcy Lytle


Marcy Lytle commented…

one of our writers in A Bundle of THYME Magazine wrote about this very topic this month!

Marcy Lytle


Marcy Lytle commented…

will share your link on our FB page...would love our readers to read your article too.

Princess Luna


Princess Luna commented…

It's hard for me to imagine the amount of inhumanity it would take to call anyone of lesser worth for no longer being a virgin.

Whitney Combs


Whitney Combs commented…

I disagree in part with this article. The transgression here appears to be one of focusing on actions instead of the heart. If one trains the heart of the a child, their lives will be rightly governed by it for the most part. If one trains only behavior, there is CONDITIONAL love implied, and the child will rebel when they are able, or be nothing of a person. The problem is not that the teaching is necessarily wrong, but that it misses the point, and is subsequently misinterpreted by the receiver. By NOT waiting until marriage, one DOES reduce one's worth and does become damaged, not intrinsically as a person, or in how we are loved by God, but in what one is able to offer and how healthfully one approaches marriage - and it is a lifelong brokenness. It can be moved past, but the scar(s) will always be there. Just like if one were a thief, it would cause marital strife. Those in authority in the church are simply trying to spare their children the heartache of that, as a loving parent would. But the approach misses the point. I think this article is based on naivete (due to lack of experience) and bitterness. Because of its foundation, I disagree.

Evelyn Danelle Weibel


Evelyn Danelle Weibel commented…

So this is how not to talk about purity. What would be How TO Talk About Purity?
I agree that these are bad metaphors and women should be treated with respect. Having sex before marriage doesn't mean your life is ruined. But it will have consequences, like anything.
I think that it's important to know that rules are for our own and others' protection. It's not to keep us from having fun; it's actually to keep us healthy and to help our partners--being loyal is important. Even before marriage (God does not see time like we do).
And it's important to know that sex isn't a sin. It's a wonderful, beautiful thing to be shared exclusively with the one you love. At its best. There is of course divorce and which you end up with a different partner. And should for your own safety sometimes. But though brokenness is part of the world, it's not God's plan for us and the closer we are to God's plan the happier we'll be.

Please log in or register to comment

Log In